페미니즘

최근 편집: 2021년 11월 4일 (목) 17:58
잼민쿤 (토론 | 기여)님의 2021년 11월 4일 (목) 17:58 판

Feminism is a contagious and mutagenic venereal disease that, like Syphilis, affects both the reproductive system and the nervous system of women who were deficient in the antibodies present in the sperm of Human males, i.e. single females and lesbians. Symptoms of Feminism include: infertility, uterine damage, encephalitis resulting in increased aggression (just like Rabies), adrenaline overdose (magnifying their already-aggressive amygdalas by 99%), severe allergy to males, mental retardation, Down syndrome, autism endocrine dysfunction, obesity, diabetes, excessive growth of body hair, toxic body odour, vagina dentata, breast cancer, cervical cancer, ovarian cancer, brain cancer, cancer in general, and paranoid schizophrenia involving a phobia that The Man and everything (even the trees) is out to rape them. Some victims of severe infection by Feminism are hopelessly mutated so much that they resemble less Human Female but rather as rabid, mimondless and extremely violent canines that murder any Human male near them, or mutated gigantic zombie landwhales that kill every form of life around them with their stink.

However, because of our modern politically-correct society, everybody now pretends that Feminism (or more like FAILminism, amirite?) is not a physiological-mental illness caused by a deadly virus that puts AIDS and Ebola to shame, but rather some sort of "philosophy" that promotes the "absolute equality between male and female" and because it's "inherent" and "natural" and therefore should not be cured, employing the same position with the issue of Autism. Any efforts to cure feminists get shouted down and persecuted as "misogynistic Patriarchs," just like how compassionate people who promote Euthanasia and putting the autistics out of their misery are immediately condemned for "Nazism" and shot on sight. Due to this the once respectable medical diagnosis evolved into mainly an excuse for misandry and for spoiled brats to be entitled to anything they want and abuse hardworking males whenever they want, because women should be "strong", "assertive", and "liberated" (in other words, insufferable bitches) without even understanding or reading the actual philosophy behind gender equality. The vast majority of these pretending "Feminists" are too inept, callous or lazy to do actual research, if they do they cherry pick incomplete evidence or ignore it altogether. It's also the idea that we can make both sexes equal by focusing solely on the issues of one of them.

In the biological history of Mammalian Evolution, feminism is a complete and utter contradiction to our own genetic structure. We are not spiders whose males are eaten after sex by females who can abandon hundred of their eggs in a random location. For mammal foetuses such as Humans to develop intelligence the female must be drained of all her resources, reducing her into an incubator, which means, the responsibility of protecting one's species, including developing muscle and using one's brain to create what we know as Human Civilization, falls onto the Male. Since the first Vertebrate emerged out of the oceans into life on land this was the standard as it had always been. This is why Feminism is so lethal to humans, and only proves the old truth that Nature dictated that Mammalian women are most efficient in two things: homemaking and servitude to the dick.

Feminists, these people who go around trying to coin "gender neutral" words and spewing variations of the saying "We can do it!" are in themselves a contradiction since they are the loudest, most vocal evidence of the differences between men and women. The main difference between the sexes is that men never have vagina envy, not even the gays because that's how much it rocks to have dick and balls. No one actually believes this drivel, not even the feminists themselves, if they did, they'd be protesting for women to register for the draft. Feminists will never be satisfied no matter how much legal, political, social and economic superiority is granted to them over men. If the "philosophy" of feminism was genuine, it would have disappeared when discrimination against women ended a long time ago and feminists around the globe would have celebrated by shaving their arm pits. But again, feminism is not a philosophy. It is a disease.

Radical feminism is a terrorist hate group disguised as liberal egalitarianism, practiced mainly by violent dishonest psychotic misanthropic terminally-mentally-infected landwhales who resent their biological inferiority while suffering from penis and beauty envy that generally believe that society is ruled by a patriarchy against numerous mountains of evidence that prove the contrary and at the same time amusingly wanting to build exactly the same social system they oppose by creating a matriarchy, which ironically already exists in the Modern First World that treats men and boys as the "Expendable Gender" that only exists to work and die 24/7 for the Females ala emulating the Insectoid lifestyle in contradiction to our mammalian biology. In a truly patriarchal world they would have all been incarcerated in psychiatric hospitals and cured of their infection, proving once and for all that their main belief is bullshit.

Considering that even a cursory look at the history of the feminist movement reveals a massively disproportionate amount of lesbians involved in feminism, and it all becomes rather spoopy "Feminists" attempt to create a socially acceptable lifestyle for lesbians (a career, no husband, no kids, girl-on-girl domestic violence). However, this original template for lesbian emancipation as applied to all women means that straight women now step out of high school/university and straight into 40 years of non-stop wage slavery. They sometimes forgo marriage/children, take up eating/drinking/smoking to cope, and die a lonely death, with their body eaten finally by their pet cats.

One can identify when a female is in the beginning stages of Feminist infection when she realizes her pussy is dry like the Sahara, her boobs are saggy like Niagra Falls, her menstruation is so acidic it melts the strongest metals on the Periodic Table, and her face is an abomination unto God. They like to mindlessly blabber and flap their disproportional arms, arbitrarily forbidding everyone from living their life as they please. This is because they possess neither the brilliance nor the beauty to get anywhere in their own lives.

Feminists come in many extremes, just like their "our-bitches-'n'-whores-wives-are-fucking-insane!" male counterparts, MRA-Men Rights Activist. At one end of the spectrum are the "grrl power" types, who've watched too many Sex and the City reruns and think feminism means fucking a lot and getting men to buy them jewelry; at the other end are the Valerie Solanas fanwomyn, who dream of someday shooting a talentless fag patriarch in a bad wig.

It should also be noted that feminists will often wear badges that they got from their wimmins gyms with slogans such as "Don't Assume I cook", even though feminists want to be independent, so they would need to know how to cook to survive.

Examples of once-prosperous nation-states rendered in the process of extinction by the Feminist plague include Japan and Europe, their sexual and familial activities all sterilized and their native population dying out like a game of Plague Inc. (Europe's population is currently being replaced by those kebabs immune to feminist infection, while the Japs have already accepted mass suicide via Animu). Continued ignorance of the surviving nations such as America on the truth of the nature of the Feminist Pandemic will result in the destruction of the Male Y Chromosome, and ultimately, the extinction of all human life. If Madagascar doesn't figure out a cure, then say goodbye to MANkind. TL;DR: They just want the same shit as men. They're just too autistic to understand that they already fucking have it.

Ideological Bullshit at its purest

Quote# 87815

All Men Should Be Castrated? - International "Castration Day"

Some Feminists have considered this as an option. It is highly controversial.

Allow me to introduce myself...

My name is Krista, otherwise known as "The Femitheist". I am a female, a feminist, and someone who believes strongly in True Equality.

Now, I will begin explaining this entry before I post the actual article... for your discussion, of course.

Women MUST and WILL have equality, and this is the ONLY way to achieve TRUE equality. The testicles of all males, which produce the majority of their testosterone, are the primary cause of their violent behavior. The testicles also attribute greatly to many of the health problems men experience later in life (such as prostate cancer and, of course, testicular cancer).

~:The Solution... International Castration Day.:~

It is my belief (which I consider factual based on my research) that all men SHOULD be castrated. Not only for their own safety, but for the safety of all innocent women and children.

And, to achieve this...

The entire world should have an international holiday known as: "Castration Day"

Males of all ages will be brought to the public squares of their cities nude, to stand together in a circle, as they await castration by a woman known as "The Castrator", who will be a woman chosen from the public much like a juror.

Girls of all ages will attend, lining the streets to cheer and applaud the males as they join the rest of civilized society.

It will be a free vacation for any working woman. And, young girls will be able to leave school to attend this glorious ceremony.

The males will then have one hour to get to know their Castrator. Their female "spouse" will also be able to choose whether or not they would like to milk the male in order to retain a sperm sample.

If the male is too young for a "spouse", their mother or closest female relative will decide.

After this, the men will be given anesthetics. They will be placed on a table, where their Castrator will then slice open their ball-sack, remove their testicles, and the excess skin, stitch them up and clean them up.

They will be given thirty minutes to rest after the procedure.

Once the males have all been castrated, they will be grouped together again for one last look before walking nude back to their homes.

The women will then return to their jobs, schools, et cetera, and rejoice in the completion of yet another successful ceremony.

Any man who tries to evade this holiday, "Castration Day", should be murdered wherever they are found (treated as a criminal, as it will be a crime not to attend). Or, forced to attend. Regardless of age.

Any woman who disagrees should be provided therapy in order to free her from misogynistic indoctrination.

This holiday should replace the day known currently as "Father's Day".

If this practice were adopted officially all across the world, all war, crime, and violence would end.

We would have a true Eutopia, where peace reigns, and men do only what they exist for...

Breed.

Labor.

SERVE.

Die.

Likewise, the change of their hormones would make them less aggressive, and thus less likely to rape. It would also provide them with better health throughout their life, as the testicles are a major cause of health issues in males as they age.

All will profit from this...

And, I believe this will come to be someday soon.

Thanks for your consideration!

What this mentally retarded cunt doesn't know is that castration ELIMINATES the ability to breed, neither is castration a way to prevent wars because surely all wars happen because someone jizzed in their pants.

어원

각각 한국어로 여성주의와 여성주의자로 번역되는 영어 단어 페미니즘(feminism)과 페미니스트(feminist)는 1800년대 프랑스정치 담론에서 쓰이던 'féminisme'에서 유래하며, 당시에는 여성 해방(women's emancipation)과 동의어로 쓰였고 1800년대 중반에는 "여성의 자질(qualities of females)"을 지칭할 때에만 쓰였다.[1] 불어 단어 féminisme의 더 자세한 첫 사용 시기에는 여러가지 설이 있어 확실한 것은 없으나, 적어도 1890년대에 페미니즘 또는 페미니스트라는 단어가 유럽 전역에서 널리 쓰이게 되었다는 사실은 1900년 이전에 벨기에, 프랑스, 스페인, 이탈리아, 독일, 그리스, 러시아의 출판물에서 해당 용어가 쓰인 기록들이 나타내어 주고 있다.[2] 다음을 참고할 것 페미니즘의 어원

한편, 스스로 페미니스트(feministe)로 칭한 최초의 인물은 프랑스의 여성 참정권 운동가인 위베르틴 오클레르이다. 오클레르는 1882년 자신이 발행하던 정기 간행물 'La Citoyenne(여성 시민)'에서 스스로와 동료들을 페미니스트라 지칭하였다.[2]

한편 대한민국 사회에서 페미니즘은 여러 가지 용어로 번역, 사용돼 왔다.[3] 1970년대 중반 페미니즘의 도입기에는 여권론, 1980년대에는 여성해방론, 1990년대 종반을 넘어서면서는 여성주의 또는 페미니즘이라는 원문 그대로를 쓰는 것이 일반적이 되었다.[3] 그러나 어떤 용어로 사용되든 그 개념에는 기본적으로 모든 성차별과 억압에 반대하고 성평등을 지향한다는 정신이 관통하며 단지 각 용어가 사용되는 시대적 상황과 배경에 따라 페미니즘을 통해 드러내고자 하는 것 혹은 주안점이 달라지면서 용어가 달라졌을 뿐이다.[3]

갈래

다양한 갈래의 페미니즘은 "왜/어떻게 여성들이 억압받는가?"라는 질문에 각기 다른 대답을 모색하면서 발전해왔다. 다음을 참고할 것 페미니즘의 갈래

범위

페미니즘은 오로지 여성 인권만을 위한 것이라는 오해를 종종 받는다. 하지만 페미니즘 운동과 사상에는 여러 갈래가 있기에,[4] 페미니즘이 다루는 범위를 여성 인권 문제에 국한하여 말하기에는 어려움이 있다. 역사적으로 페미니즘이 중상위층 백인 여성의 경험만 과도하게 강조해왔다는 비난을 받았던 적이 있는 것은 사실이나, 여성 인권 문제에 대한 고민은 억압받는 다른 주체들에 대한 인식, 다양한 억압의 형태, 억압의 구조와 역사 등에 대한 고민으로 이어질 수 밖에 없다. 이에 따라 일부 페미니즘은 다양한 젠더 담론을 포괄해 성소수자의 권리, 나아가 다양한 약자들의 권리를 외치는 사상으로 확장되기도 하였다. 다음을 참고할 것 페미니즘의 범위

역사

다음을 참고할 것 페미니즘의 역사 문서를 살펴보세요.

한국 페미니즘

한국에 여성학이 도입된 것은 1970년대 중반이라고 할 수 있다. 한국 최초의 여성학 강의는 1977년 이화여자대학교여성학 강좌라는 이름으로 개설되었다. 이는 한국은 물론 아시아에서도 처음이었다.[5] 한편 한국의 페미니즘은 2010년대까지 호주제 폐지와 같은, 주로 정책과 제도를 위한 페미니즘의 성격을 띄고 있었으며[주 1], 래디컬 페미니즘적인 면모는 사회적으로 잘 드러나지 않았다. 이후 메갈리아와 함께 연쇄적으로 탄생한 여러 페미니즘 담론과 운동은 대부분 복합적인 성격을 띄는데, 주로 래디컬 페미니즘포스트모던 페미니즘이 섞인 형태이다. 한국의 페미니즘은 메갈리아 사태로 인한 페미니즘 리부트 이후에 여러 페미니즘 이론과 권력, 차별 이론 등이 급격하게 수입되는 바람에 결국 다양한 사회 현상을 낳았다. 이 때에 페미니즘 뿐만 아니라 성소수자 이슈, 비거니즘 이슈, 성노동 이론 등이 함께 조명되었다.

다음을 참고할 것 한국의 페미니즘

비판

페미니즘에 대한 건설적인 비판만 서술하길 바랍니다. 물론 각 스펙트럼 간의 상호 비판도 올려도 됩니다.

  • 카밀 파일라(Camille Paglia 1947-)는 1994년 페미니스트들이 자신들의 의견을 관철하기 위해 여론 검열, 음반, 게임, 영화, 영상물 등에 대한 검열 정당화 및 목적 달성, 이견 분쇄를 위해 뇌물과 돈, 로비, 이권, 인사 개입, 압력, 성 로비 등의 각종 이권행사를 한다고 비판했다.
  • 상호교차성 페미니즘래디컬 페미니즘을 보고 여성의 개인적 특성과 PC(정치적 올바름)를 무시한다고 비판하고, 래디컬 페미니즘상호교차성 페미니즘이 결국 여성인권을 뒷전으로 미루게 만든다고 비판한다.
  • 1970년대 포르노 논쟁에서 문화적 래디컬 페미니즘자유의지론적 급진적 페미니즘포르노그래피를 옹호하는 행위가 여성에게 해를 끼친다고 비판하였고, 자유의지론적 급진적 페미니즘문화적 래디컬 페미니즘이 포르노를 금지하려는 행동이 여성의 쾌락과 자유를 제약한다고 비판하였다.
  • 섹스네거티브 페미니스트들은 섹스포지티브 페미니스트들이 여성에게 해로운 영향을 끼칠 가능성이 높은 성적 행동에 방치되도록 조장하고 있다고 비판하며, 섹스포지티브 페미니스트들은 섹스네거티브 페미니스트들이 여성이 누릴 수 있는 쾌락과 즐거움을 모두 공포와 폭력이라는 이름 아래 몰아넣고 있다고 비판한다.
  • 성노동 이론 페미니스트들은 반성매매 페미니스트들이 성노동자의 주체성과 당사자성을 무시하고 성노동자가 아닌 일반 여성들만을 위한 페미니즘 이론을 펼친다고 비판하고, 반성매매 페미니스트들은 성노동 이론 페미니스트들이 일반 여성들을 위험한 성산업에 끌어들이는 이론을 펼친다고 비판한다.

페미니즘, 페미니스트 의문·비난·대답·반박

다음을 참고할 것 페미니즘/의문과 대답

여기는 태생적인 한계 등으로 인한 건설적인 비판이 아닌 몰이해로 생긴 무조건적인 비난이나 오해,일반화 등을 서술하는 하위 문서입니다.

여러분들의 기여가 필요합니다.

기타

  • 영어에서 페미니즘은 가산명사와 불가산명사 두 가지 형태로 쓰일 수 있으며 가산명사일 때의 복수형은 feminisms이다.[6] <나쁜 페미니스트>에 나온 것처럼, 페미니즘이 하나의 단일한 존재가 아니라 여러 모습으로 공존하며 존재할 수 있다는 점을 나타내기 위해 이 점을 강조하기도 한다.
  • 여성의 정치적, 경제적, 개인적, 사회적 권리를 정의하고 달성하기 위한 현실 변혁을 꾀하는 것 역시 페미니즘의 일부이다. 애당초 페미니즘이 여성인권을 향상시키기 위해 변화를 주는 것이기에 당연하다.

같이 보기

링크

부연 설명

  1. 이는 리버럴 페미니즘의 특징이기도 하다.

출처

  • 권현정 외, 2003, 페미니즘 역사의 재구성, 공감.
  • 김수영, 고려대학교 2011년 2학기 '성과 사회' 강의자료
  1. 스탠포드 철학백과, 페미니즘의 주제들, 샐리 해스랭어 외, 전기가오리 번역
  2. 2.0 2.1 Karen M. Offen (2000). 《European Feminisms, 1700-1950: A Political History》. Stanford University Press. ISBN 978-0-8047-3420-2. 
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 (사)한국여성연구소. 《개정판 새 여성학강의》. 동녘. 18쪽. ISBN 9788972974826. 
  4. “Feminist movements and ideologies”. 《영문 위키백과》. 
  5. 새 여성학 강의 개정판, (사)한국여성연구소, 동녘 출판사, 18-19p
  6. “Wiktionary 'Feminism' 항목. "feminism (countable and uncountable, plural feminisms)"로 명시되어 있다.,”. 《Wiktionary》.